Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Water Conservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee backs bill limiting overhead irrigation for small, nonfunctional turf in Great Salt Lake Basin
Summary
Sponsors said House Bill 328 would require water-wise design for new commercial, institutional and industrial developments in the Great Salt Lake Basin by defining 'nonfunctional turf' and discouraging overhead spray irrigation in small, low‑use areas; supporters emphasized conservation while turf producers urged narrowly tailored definitions.
The Senate Government Operations Committee voted to recommend House Bill 328 out of committee after a lengthy public-comment period that included water districts, municipal staff, turf producers and conservation groups.
Joel Williams, director of the Division of Water Resources, told senators the bill is narrowly focused: it applies only to new development in the Great Salt Lake Basin and to commercial, institutional and industrial properties, not existing residential yards or existing development. ‘‘I wanna make it clear, we're not anti grass. Grass is great,’’ Williams said, adding the measure targets small, nonfunctional plantings—park strips, parking islands and isolated narrow strips—where overhead spray irrigation is inefficient.
Supporters, including Jordan Valley Water Conservancy District and Weber Basin Water representatives, said two-thirds of municipal water use is outdoor and that limiting unnecessary overhead spray irrigation in narrowly defined areas is a cost‑effective conservation step. ‘‘This is smart forward thinking policy,’’ said Kean Robinson, a private citizen who testified in support.
Opponents and those seeking amendments—including turf producers and Kirk Harris, a producer and farmer—warned the statute’s draft definition could unintentionally target well‑managed turf that provides stormwater filtration, urban cooling and erosion control. They proposed focusing the language on ‘‘inefficient irrigation zones’’ (e.g., narrow strips under 10 feet, parking islands, slopes over 25 percent) and allowing efficient new irrigation technology rather than a blanket limit on turf.
Sponsor Representative Oakland said the bill mandates developer notice of requirements but does not force cities to enforce removal nor require retrofits for existing property. He and supporters emphasized the bill would nudge good design at the time of new development.
The committee voted to recommend the substitute out favorably after discussion. Sponsors said they will work with turf producers and municipal leaders to clarify definitions and enforcement pathways during the next legislative steps.
What to watch: Implementation details (definitions of nonfunctional turf, enforcement by municipalities, and allowance for new efficient technologies) will be the primary area for amendments and follow-up with stakeholders.
