Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commissioners deny York College signage request, approve small sports-authority grant

York County Board of Commissioners · May 19, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board denied a $150,000 rebranding/signage request from York College (recommended half by the Visitors Bureau) after debate over appropriate use of improvement funds, and approved a $6,130.56 grant for restroom upgrades at the York County Sports Authority to support tournament readiness.

York County commissioners on May 3 voted to deny a request from York College (rebranding to York University) for improvement funds to pay for campus signage and a potential scrolling sign, and separately approved a smaller grant to the York County Sports Authority for restroom upgrades.

Jared Stark, representing York College in the room, described a multi-phase rebrand and asked the county for $150,000 toward signage and visitor wayfinding. The York County Visitors Bureau recommended an initial $50,000 payment. Commissioners discussed whether improvement funds — supported by lodging/tourism revenues — should be used for college branding versus brick-and-mortar tourism infrastructure. Several commissioners said they were reluctant to use improvement funds for signage; one moved to deny the grant request, and the motion carried on roll call.

Separately, Brian Tonogis requested $6,130.56 from improvement funds to replace leaking restroom fixtures and improve accommodations at the county sports complex; the Visitors Bureau supported the request as tournament-ready improvements that generate lodging tax revenue. The board approved the Sports Authority request by roll call.

The decisions illustrate the board’s approach to improvement-fund allocations: they favored a small, facility-improvement request tied to tourism economic activity and declined a larger branding request that commissioners viewed as outside the fund’s primary purpose.