Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ethics Code topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Civic Affairs committee advances draft ethics ordinance with independent hearing officer
Summary
The committee approved inserting proposed ethics-code additions that tighten conflict-of-interest definitions, create a signed-complaint intake, and route complaints to an independent retired judge as hearing officer; the draft will be forwarded to the full assembly for consideration.
Get email alerts on the Ethics Code topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Assemblymember Potter introduced a package of proposed additions to Skagway Municipality’s ethics ordinance aimed at clarifying conflicts of interest and establishing a complaint and hearing process. "I do not think that assembly members should be eligible to be hired for a job that they were a part of creating," Potter said, citing the need for public confidence and pointing to models used by other Alaska communities.
The draft tightens the definition of conflict of interest, requires signed complaints with contact information (no anonymous allegations), and designates the municipal attorney as an initial reviewing officer for intake. Potter described a three-step process: intake and initial review, a referral to an independent retired Alaska judge as a hearing officer, and publication of final findings with redaction of personal or sensitive data. "Any person may file a complaint alleging a violation of this code by an official," Potter said, summarizing the intake rules and the burden of proof resting with the complainant.
Committee members noted the language draws from codes used in Wasilla and materials from the Alaska Municipal League and that the borough attorney has reviewed the draft and suggested changes that were accommodated in this version. Assemblymember Morgan praised the revisions as “1000 times better than what we have currently,” and Clerk Barnum confirmed that the mayor intends to sponsor the measure to the full assembly.
The draft preserves explicit limits on remedies: while the ethics scheme allows public reprimands, censures, mandatory training, restitution and removal from appointed boards, Potter emphasized that "nothing in the section shall authorize removal of an elected official from office," which would be beyond the ordinance’s authority. The committee voted to insert the proposed additions into the standards-of-conduct section of the draft ordinance and to recommend the ordinance to the full assembly for adoption, with staff and attorney notes attached.
The committee asked that the borough attorney finalize language and that the mayor sponsor the ordinance at the next assembly meeting. The matter will next appear before the full assembly for first reading and formal action.
