Citizen Portal
Sign In

Lifetime Citizen Portal Access — AI Briefings, Alerts & Unlimited Follows

Public works committee asks staff to rewrite municipal equipment rental policy

Skagway Municipality Public Works Committee · January 29, 2026

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Skagway Public Works Committee asked staff to draft a revised resolution updating the municipality's equipment rental rates and policies (Resolution 0901), citing a 2009 fee schedule, low rental use and liability concerns; staff will return with proposed wording and cost justifications.

The Skagway Municipality Public Works Committee on Jan. 29 asked staff to return with a revised equipment-rental policy that would replace language in Resolution 0901 and update fees and use rules.

Deputy Manager Kamika told the committee that "the resolution and therefore the fees ... are from 2009," and said staff needs guidance on whether to continue offering equipment for public rental, whether rentals should include municipal operators, and whether equipment should be used on private property. Kamika said staff would present reasoning for any proposed rate changes (hourly labor plus fringe benefits) so the committee understands the basis for increases.

Assembly member Hillis, expressing concern about liability and frequency of rentals, said he did not recall many rentals beyond dumpsters. "I can't recall the last time we have rented anything other than dumpsters," Kamika responded, a point other members cited in arguing the municipality might not need a broad rental program.

Assembly member Potter moved that staff bring back to Public Works a revised resolution updating Resolution 0901 with feedback from the meeting; the motion was seconded and approved by voice vote. The committee asked staff to (1) remove equipment items that present liability or operational conflicts, (2) clarify which items are still owned by the municipality, and (3) include a clear explanation of cost elements for any proposed rate increases.

Several residents and members said the municipality should avoid competing with local contractors and instead keep rates primarily for municipal needs or for charging when property owners damage municipal assets. Michael Yi, a resident, urged sensitivity to affordability for retirees and other residents on fixed incomes when changing fees.

Next steps: staff will prepare a draft resolution and supporting cost justification for a future Public Works meeting.