Senate Judiciary Committee advances Article V balanced‑budget application after divided testimony

Senate Judiciary Committee · March 3, 2026

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Sign Up Free
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Senate Judiciary Committee voted 5-3 to advance SR 262, an Article V application asking Congress to call a convention to propose a balanced‑budget amendment; supporters called it sensible fiscal policy while opponents and democracy‑protection groups warned of a risky, potentially open‑ended convention despite state-level delegate limits.

The Senate Judiciary Committee on Monday advanced SR 262, a resolution applying to Congress under Article V to call a convention to propose a balanced‑budget amendment to the U.S. Constitution, after a 5‑3 vote.

Chairman Kousserd presented the resolution as narrowly focused on a single subject — “a balanced budget with exceptions that are for emergencies or national defense” — and said Georgia’s submission includes a statutory delegate‑limitation provision (code section 28‑6‑8) that restricts delegates’ scope and imposes an oath and criminal penalty for violations. “It’s just really sensible fiscal policy, that I would love to see our nation get on track to do,” he told the committee.

Supporters argued the measure is a lawful, targeted use of Article V to restore fiscal discipline. Sully Sullivan, identifying himself as a member of the Black Republican Council, said SR 262 “is narrowly focused on fiscal restraints” and expressed confidence the state’s delegate instructions would prevent a broader agenda.

Opponents countered that an Article V convention’s procedures are undefined and risk opening the Constitution to unrelated change. Christy Minor testified the proposal “is a false solution” and warned a convention could be used to pursue measures far beyond fiscal policy. A representative from Common Cause Georgia urged the committee to “approach SR 262 with caution and to not advance this resolution,” saying the Constitution provides no enforceable rules guaranteeing a convention’s scope or delegate selection.

The resolution’s author noted a prior 2014 submission on the same subject and said the current version includes a sunset and explicit statutory steps for appointing and binding delegates. The committee recorded the motion to pass (moved by Senator Watson) and the tally was 5 in favor, 3 opposed; the measure advances to the next stage of the legislative process.

What’s next: SR 262 will be carried forward for consideration by the full Senate if scheduling allows, and the application would count toward the 34‑state threshold required to trigger an Article V convention only if other states file similar applications.