Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Meeting Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: Inland Wetlands Commission actions, March 4
Summary
The Town of Farmington Inland Wetlands Commission accepted several new applications for review and recorded procedural votes on March 4, including acceptance of applications for a private pool, a 55+ development, and a deck replacement; minutes were approved with one abstention.
At its March 4 meeting the Town of Farmington Inland Wetlands Commission recorded several procedural votes and determinations.
94 Alpine Drive (Peter Sedovandemi): The commission voted to accept the homeowner’s application for review to allow a reduced setback for an in‑ground pool. The applicant said the lot is bisected by a town line and identified wetlands to the rear; the applicant agreed to install silt fencing and straw waddles and to work with planning staff on inspections before and during construction. The commission’s acceptance was a voice vote; the transcript records the motion and a voice vote approving the application for review.
598 Plainville Road (JBS Developers): The commission accepted the applicant’s revised submission for review after consultants explained a revised layout that reduces units from 20 to 18 following a new wetland delineation and described detention basins and grouped infiltration systems. Acceptance is administrative (to proceed with technical review and a site walk), not final approval.
373 Collinsville Road (Ryan Murphy): The commission accepted an after‑the‑fact application for a completed deck replacement and later voted that the work is "not significant" under wetlands regulations; a formal permit vote will occur at a subsequent meeting.
Minutes approval: The commission approved the minutes of Feb. 18; Commissioner Robert Eisner is recorded as abstaining in the transcript on one vote during the minutes approval process.
Notes on procedure: Where the transcript records voice votes without roll‑call tallies, the outcome is summarized as recorded in the meeting. Movers and seconders are not consistently attributed by name in the transcript; motions are reported here as recorded.
