Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Snap topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Witness says Trump administration is "using hunger as a political weapon" by withholding SNAP aid
Summary
A witness told a gathering that the Trump administration is deliberately withholding SNAP benefits and using hunger "as a political weapon," alleging officials prioritize other expenditures — including an asserted $40,000,000,000 payment abroad and luxury purchases — while children go hungry. The transcript does not identify the venue or the speaker by name.
A witness said the Trump administration is deliberately withholding food aid and "using hunger as a political weapon," arguing federal funds exist but are being directed elsewhere.
The speaker opened by saying, "There is enough money in The United States Of America," and singled out SNAP as an example of aid being withheld from "regular people." The witness accused officials of enabling hunger "as a political weapon," urging listeners not to be swayed by the setting or appearances.
The remark placed responsibility on the administration's priorities rather than on an overall lack of funds. The witness asserted it is within the president's authority "to make sure everybody gets fed" and called the current strategy "a new low."
To illustrate the claim of misplaced priorities, the witness said the administration "have the flexibility to provide $40,000,000,000 to a right wing government in Argentina, even though they have the flexibility to purchase a new luxury aircraft, even though they have the flexibility to buy a golden toilet," and contrasted those alleged expenditures with cuts or limits on child nutrition programs. These figures and examples are presented as the witness's allegations and are not substantiated elsewhere in the transcript.
The speaker concluded that the situation is not a scarcity of money but "a decision that they have made to withhold what people need in order to generate political leverage against their adversaries," and said that those with wealth or connections are protected while others suffer.
The transcript does not identify the venue, date, or the speaker by name, nor does it record any response, official clarification, or corroborating evidence to the allegations in the excerpted remarks. No formal motion or vote followed these remarks in the provided text.
