Votes at a glance: Burnsville council approves consent agenda, liquor license for Muddy Chicken and a cannabis permit

Burnsville City Council · February 18, 2026

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The council adopted its consent agenda and approved a liquor license for Muddy Chicken (3120 Highway 13 West) and a conditional use permit for a cannabis microbusiness after staff presentations; the transcript records voice votes and 'motion carries' but does not provide roll-call tallies or mover/second names.

The Burnsville City Council handled a series of routine and quasi-permitting votes during its meeting.

Consent agenda: The council adopted the consent agenda by motion and voice vote; no consent items were pulled for separate consideration and no online requests to pull items were recorded.

Muddy Chicken liquor license: Deputy City Clerk Erica Henderson presented an application from Minnesota Bar Ops doing business as Muddy Chicken at 3120 Highway 13 West for an on-sale intoxicating liquor license and a Sunday license. "Principal PD has come, conducted their background check and nothing was bound to deny their license," Henderson said. With no public speakers for the item, the council moved and carried approval by voice vote. The transcript does not record a roll-call tally or the names of the mover and seconder.

Conditional use permit (cannabis microbusiness): The council approved a conditional use permit for a cannabis retail use near Highway 13 West following a Planning Manager presentation and a prior Planning Commission 4–1 recommendation. Planning staff noted some inconsistency in the record about the applicant and site: the transcript references multiple business names (including Root Kind Holdings LLC, Chillwater Cannabis Shop/Perry Wynn Herb LLC, and Prairie Wind Herb Co. LLC) and different addresses; staff told council the applicant later said it would not be purchasing the entire building it had described in the application.

Record and next steps: All three motions were carried by voice vote as recorded in the transcript. The record does not provide formal roll-call tallies or identify the council members who moved and seconded each motion. Where the transcript is inconsistent about a company name or address, the article reports the names and numbers exactly as they appear in the record and notes the inconsistency.