Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget Pensions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
San Luis Obispo council redirects $2M earmark to CalPERS ADP, totaling roughly $4.5M in extra pension payment
Summary
Council voted 3–2 to apply $2 million previously assigned for a Section 115 prefunding trust toward an additional discretionary payment (ADP) to CalPERS, joining other one‑time ADP funds to produce roughly $4.5 million toward pension obligations. Council also unanimously approved closing the Section 115 account if doing so is cost‑neutral.
The San Luis Obispo City Council voted 3–2 on Tuesday to redirect $2,000,000 that had been assigned for a Section 115 pension prefunding trust into an additional discretionary CalPERS payment (ADP), increasing the city’s near‑term ADP to about $4.5 million.
City Manager McDonald and finance staff framed the choice to council as a trade‑off between an irrevocable, invested trust vehicle and making payments directly to CalPERS. "Deposits into the trust are irrevocable," Director Emily Jackson said, adding that the trust typically invests more aggressively than the city’s cash and therefore carries greater market risk as well as the potential for somewhat higher returns than city‑managed cash but lower than what CalPERS’ long‑term return might deliver on amounts paid into the pension system.
The motion approved by the council directs staff to apply the assigned funds as part of the ADP the council had already discussed, and to reflect that direction in the upcoming supplemental budget. "We could repurpose the $2,000,000 that’s assigned for the 1‑15 trust for the ADP instead," Jackson said during the presentation.
Mayor Erica Stewart and Councilmember Shoresman voted against the redirection, saying they favored retaining flexibility and a fiscal cushion. "I want to make sure we have a little bit for the rainy day," Stewart said, noting concerns about tighter forecasts in later years. Vice Mayor Emily Francis, Councilmembers Marks and Boswell supported the redirection on the grounds that applying funds sooner reduces long‑term pension liabilities and puts money to work where it will directly lower the city’s pension exposure.
The council separately approved, by a unanimous 5–0 vote, a motion to close the Section 115 trust account provided doing so is cost‑neutral for the city. Staff said the trust currently has a zero balance and that dissolving it would carry no fiscal risk, but pledged to confirm any procedural or administrative steps with CalPERS and report back if costs or penalties apply.
Why it matters: The city will make another substantial discretionary pension payment to CalPERS if the supplemental budget follows council direction. City staff said ADPs have historically produced a direct reduction in pension liabilities, while a Section 115 trust is useful as a guarded reserve if the city ever faced difficulty making required payments. The decision changes how the $2,000,000 will be managed in the near term and signals council prioritization of direct pension payoff over placement into an irrevocable trust.
What’s next: Staff will incorporate the council’s direction into the June supplemental budget and return with the exact appropriation language, timing for the ADP, and any administrative steps to close the Section 115 trust if that continues to be the council’s preference.
