Monterey One Water outlines $500 million capital plan, signals potential 8% rate increase

Seaside City Council and Redevelopment Agency · March 6, 2026

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Monterey One Water officials told Seaside council the utility faces roughly $500 million in capital needs over five years and will begin Proposition 218 rate-notice steps; preliminary modeling estimates an about 8% increase in year one that would lift the typical single-family sewer bill from about $54 to roughly $58.32 per month, subject to board decisions and financing.

Paul Sciuto, executive officer of Monterey One Water, told the Seaside City Council on March 5 that the regional wastewater provider faces major capital and operating pressures and will ask its board for direction on a Proposition 218 rate notice in the coming months.

“We’re going to the board in March … requesting a Proposition 218 rate increase,” Sciuto said, explaining the agency manages roughly $1 billion in treatment and pump-station assets and currently treats about 17 million gallons per day of wastewater with a 30 million-gallon-per-day capacity. He said staff are preliminarily modeling about $500 million in capital work over the next five years and that preliminary numbers indicate an approximately 8% increase in the first year if the board moves in that direction.

Sciuto translated the preliminary model to a household impact: “Right now [a single-family dwelling] is about $54 per month. An 8% increase would bump it up to $58.32 per month,” he said, noting the final amount will depend on the board’s policy direction and financing decisions.

Why it matters: Monterey One Water said capital investments will prioritize pump-station upgrades, ongoing treatment-plant maintenance and electrical reliability, and a treatment-plant master plan to map 35 years of future needs. The agency also highlighted energy costs — Sciuto cited roughly $9.2 million annually for power and more than $8 million for chemicals — and said energy projects and grant funding are part of the strategy to hold down long-term bills.

Council members focused questions on rate structure and equity. Councilmember Miller asked whether the current single-family rate treats a one-bedroom the same as a five-bathroom house; Sciuto confirmed the utility currently uses a flat single-family rate and said the board rejected property-tax funding and fixture-count approaches in past discussions. He described a possible low-volume exception: “If you live by yourself and can demonstrate low water usage, there could be a discount,” he said, characterizing it as an exception rather than a broad restructuring.

Sciuto also briefed council on how the agency funds projects: a mix of enterprise funds, low-interest federal loans (LIFIA), bonds and grant funding. He said the expansion project to increase indirect potable reuse capacity cost about $63 million, with roughly $42 million in state and federal support and $21 million financed through low-interest loans.

What’s next: Monterey One Water will present formal rate proposals and Proposition 218 notices to its board later this spring. The agency plans public information sessions, a 45-day public comment period after a formal notice, and a board decision expected in June on whether to proceed and by how much.

Council response: City and council members thanked the presenter and requested follow-up information on potential equity protections, alternatives to a flat structure, and outreach plans for Seaside residents.