Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Meeting Transparency topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cary council votes to begin televising work sessions, district meetings and retreats
Summary
The Cary Town Council voted unanimously Nov. 20 to begin videotaping and streaming council decision-making meetings using a lower-cost pilot option (staff estimated about $400 per meeting), and directed staff to return with a report on streaming boards and commissions.
The Cary Town Council voted unanimously on Nov. 20 to begin videotaping and streaming council decision-making meetings — including work sessions, quarterly meetings, district meetings, retreats and specially called public meetings — using a low-cost pilot option that staff estimates will cost about $400 per meeting.
Mayor Weinbrecht moved the motion and Councilmember Jennifer Bryson Robinson seconded it. Staff and the Information Services Advisory Board (ISAB) described two main approaches: a modest, fast option using webcams and existing equipment with an attendant staff member to operate audio/video (the $400 estimate), and a fuller production with professional cameras and lighting (an estimated ~$8,000 per meeting). Susan, a marketing staff member who led the presentation, said the higher-production option would be “about $8,000 a meeting” while the lower-cost approach could be implemented quickly and archived to CaryTV and YouTube for later viewing.
The council discussed accessibility and archival requirements, with several members stressing the need to address closed captioning and ADA compliance before scaling up. Susan said the initial estimate did not include upgraded captioning and that staff would return with options and costs for accessibility improvements. Councilmembers and ISAB representatives recommended a pilot period and a year-end evaluation to measure access and use.
In addition to the authorization to begin streaming council decision meetings, the council unanimously approved a follow-up motion directing staff to prepare a formal report on opportunities, costs, options and stakeholder feedback for streaming boards and commissions, with ISAB’s assistance. Councilmembers emphasized the importance of outreach to advisory panels and consideration of privacy and recruitment impacts for quasi‑judicial bodies.
The decision responds to petitions delivered at the meeting and public comments urging greater transparency and access for residents who cannot attend in person. Staff said some marketing-budget funds could cover initial pilot costs for a few months without a budget adjustment, and that more detailed budget estimates would be included in the requested staff report.
Votes at a glance • Motion to videotape/stream council decision-making meetings using the lower-cost option (staff estimate ~$400/meeting): moved by Mayor Weinbrecht; seconded by Councilmember Jennifer Bryson Robinson; outcome: approved unanimously. • Motion directing staff to prepare a report on streaming boards and commissions, with ISAB involvement: outcome: approved unanimously.
What’s next Staff will begin a pilot rollout per council direction and return with the requested report with cost estimates, accessibility options (including captioning), and recommendations for boards and commissions.
