Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Neighborhood Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Staff lays out two options to stop chronic dumping in Seaview/Silverado alleys: close or transfer property
Summary
Community development presented two conceptual solutions to chronic dumping and safety issues in a 200‑unit townhome neighborhood: (A) close or secure alley entries with bollards/fencing and cameras (higher recurring cost), or (B) survey and allocate alley land to abutting owners so maintenance becomes private responsibility (one‑time survey cost, changes lot sizes). Staff will schedule neighborhood meetings to collect input.
City staff presented a draft plan on Jan. 27 to address persistent dumping, animal scavenging and safety concerns in the Seaview/Sevadero alleyways, a neighborhood of roughly 200 townhomes.
Community Development Director Davis Hernandez described two main approaches: option A would close or limit vehicle access with bollards or fencing and add surveillance, which staff said would require significant installation and ongoing maintenance (the presentation estimated roughly 375 bollards for some approaches and material/installation costs based on October pricing). Option B would survey and allocate the alley parcels to adjacent property owners (staff estimated about $7,200 for surveying work in the draft), which would increase individual lot sizes and transfer long‑term maintenance responsibilities to property owners; staff noted shared containment or screened front‑of‑house trash enclosures as possible transitional measures.
Staff emphasized neither option is final: the draft includes approximate cost estimates and tradeoffs. Commissioners and residents asked about utility lines, trash collection logistics if alley access is removed, rental vs. owner occupancy (staff cited about 56 rentals and 93 owner‑occupied parcels along the alley), and the difficulty of enforcing dumping when the city currently owns the alley. Staff said the next step is to hold a public meeting at Champions Hall with directly affected residents to solicit input, refine cost estimates and explore additional options before returning recommendations to the commission.
Commissioners discussed code enforcement options while outreach occurs; staff said enforcement and liens are part of the toolbox but may not stop strangers from dumping on city‑owned alleyways. The commission asked staff to schedule the neighborhood meeting and return with realistic cost estimates and legal analysis of property transfer options.
