Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Code Amendments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission tables comprehensive land‑use code rewrite for further redline review and public view
Summary
After extended review of proposed multi‑chapter amendments to the Grantsville City Land Use and Management Code, commissioners voted to table the package so staff can preserve and distribute redlines and return with clarifications on conditional uses, variances, and definitions.
Grantsville planning staff presented a broad rewrite of the city’s Land Use and Management Code on March 3 that would renumber chapters, move sign and road definitions into chapter 20, clarify conditional‑use standards, add shared‑driveway and private‑street cross sections, and revise multiple definitions and use tables.
Shelley Moore reviewed changes across chapters 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14–16, 20 and 21, describing edits to definitions (for example, fourplex/four‑unit buildings and preliminary/final plat language), driveway and private‑street cross sections, landscaping and buffering standards, and a reorganization of sign regulations. Staff noted some items had been reformatted and some definitions moved to different chapters to improve consistency.
Commissioners engaged in detailed line‑by‑line discussion. Legal counsel (referred to as Tyson during the meeting) described the standard for conditional uses: in practice a conditional use is a permitted use subject to conditions and must generally be approved unless the applicant cannot substantially mitigate detrimental impacts. Commissioners pressed staff on whether definitions of “detrimental impact” and mitigation should be located only under conditional use sections or more broadly so permitted uses could also be addressed.
Other substantive exchanges covered: whether language about ‘family food production’ should specifically list horses or instead rely on a separate farm‑animal definition; how corner‑lot front yard diagrams align with textual definitions in chapter 21; trip‑based thresholds and where those trip counts originate; and how public vs. private swimming pools should be handled in use tables and permitting. Staff agreed to research examples from other cities for some definitions and to clarify where state code references should remain fixed versus paraphrased.
Commissioners expressed a desire that the public be able to see the redline edits before any final action. A commissioner moved to table the proposed amendments so staff could preserve and distribute the redline text for public review and make the clarifications discussed; the motion was seconded and passed by voice vote. Staff will return with the redline and suggested clarifications on the flagged items at a future meeting.
