Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Comment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Rowing club outlines relocation plan for Project Connect impact; resident questions park nonprofit finances

Austin Parks and Recreation Board · November 24, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

During general public comment, Austin Rowing Club volunteer Mark Eaton asked the board to support relocation planning after Project Connect affects the Waller Creek boathouse; Mark May urged the board to review nonprofit partnerships and noted cuts to the parks budget after Prop Q failed.

Two members of the public used the general-comment period at the Nov. 24 meeting to raise park-related concerns.

Mark Eaton identified himself as a longtime member of the Austin Rowing Club and chair of the clubs new-site planning committee. Eaton said Project Connects Blue Line will run through the current Waller Creek boathouse site and that the resolution the City Council passed in 2022 called for relocating the rowing club, studying feasibility for a new site, engaging community stakeholders and trying to use Project Connect funds for any new construction.

Eaton described a 12-person committee with backgrounds in architecture, law, project management and public finance that has met with Project Connect staff, community groups and local developers; he also said the club recently invested $500,000 in floating docks for rental operations and wants to preserve its rentals site if possible to maintain outreach to underserved youth.

Mark May, a District 5 resident, asked the board to improve relationships with park nonprofits after Prop Q failed and the city cut more than $5 million from parks. May cited the Austin Parks Foundations latest IRS filing and said the nonprofit holds "more than $23,000,000" in assets and now spends "more than $1,000,000" on its top seven employees, arguing the board should examine whether nonprofit partnerships are balanced and fair.

The board did not take action during the meeting but staff and members encouraged follow-up via email so the items could be placed on a future agenda for further discussion.