Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Elections Audit Request topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Group presenting 'United Sovereign Americans' urges supervisors to add election‑integrity resolution to an agenda
Summary
Members of United Sovereign Americans presented a multipart resolution alleging widespread inaccuracies in California's voter rolls and the 2022 election, asked the board to place a resolution on a future agenda, and called for end‑to‑end audits, chain‑of‑custody rules and other remedies; board members did not take action at the meeting.
A delegation identifying itself as United Sovereign Americans (USA) used the public‑comment period to read a multipart resolution alleging widespread problems with California’s voter registration rolls and the 2022 general election and to request that the Orange County Board of Supervisors place the resolution on a future agenda.
Speakers who identified themselves as Linda Han, Carolyn, Walter Nirenberg and George Garey read sections of the resolution across multiple turns. The texts presented claimed large numbers of inaccurate or uncertain registrations in California’s voter database, alleged votes cast by ineligible or uncertain registrants, and said the 2022 certification process was unlawful. The presenters urged a suite of remedies including proof of citizenship and identity at registration, public availability and challenge of voter rolls before early voting, hand‑marked ballots with verifiable imaging, full chain‑of‑custody and a randomized end‑to‑end audit with a 95% confidence interval performed by third‑party forensic auditors.
At the meeting, the presenters cited specific numeric claims from their analysis and urged the board to put the resolution on an upcoming agenda for consideration and potential local action. They asked supervisors to cooperate with state and federal officials to ensure the remedies they described are implemented. The board did not take action on the request during the meeting; the presentation occurred during public comment and was recorded by the clerk for the public record.
The group’s presentation included assertions about counts of registrations and votes they said were problematic; those claims were made by members of the public and were not verified or endorsed by county officials during the session. Presenters cited federal statutes and court precedents in their statements; no staff report, legal analysis, or motion to place the resolution on a future agenda was presented at the meeting.
