Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Workforce Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves $4M contract with UC Irvine for behavioral‑health workforce training after public criticism
Summary
The board unanimously approved a $4 million contract with UC Irvine to provide an 80‑hour certificate program for up to 400 county health staff over 3.5 years; some public speakers criticized cost per participant while supervisors said the contract is funded by Proposition 63 behavioral‑health funds and will strengthen the workforce.
The Orange County Board of Supervisors voted Oct. 8 to approve a contract with the Regents of the University of California, Irvine to provide workforce training for county Health Care Agency staff.
The contract totals $4,000,000 over about 3.5 years and supports a certificate program that provides 80 hours of training over six months to up to 400 participants. Two members of the public questioned the value and per‑participant cost, noting that $4 million spread across 400 people equals roughly $10,000 per participant and asking whether the county could use funds for other credentialed programs.
Supervisor Sarmiento and others defended the program. ‘‘This represents a significant investment in our workforce, equipping up to 400 employees with effective coaching techniques through 80 hours of training over six months,’’ one supervisor said. Supervisor Katrina Foley explained the program is being developed with the UCI Susan Samueli Integrative Health Institute and noted the funding is coming from Proposition 63 (behavioral health services) with restrictions on eligible uses.
After discussion and a motion to approve, the board carried the item unanimously.
What the county said: the Health Care Agency is seeking to expand screening, integrated care and recovery supports by training staff who work with populations with behavioral‑health needs. Public commenters urged more clarity on outcomes and on how the county measures the promised ‘‘80% improved knowledge’’ outcome listed in the contract materials.
The board did not change the contract terms on the dais. The item passed with a motion, second and unanimous vote.
