Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Gun Storage Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Orange County supervisors direct staff to draft secure gun‑storage ordinance after debate
Summary
After public testimony and a divided board discussion about privacy, enforcement and legal risk, supervisors voted 3–2 to direct county counsel to draft a secure gun‑storage ordinance clarifying when firearms in residences must be locked or disabled. Supporters cited child safety and suicide prevention.
A 3–2 majority of the Orange County Board of Supervisors on June 25 directed county counsel to draft an ordinance that would require secure storage of firearms in residences in unincorporated parts of the county.
Supervisor Katrina Foley, who introduced the item, said the measure is meant to clarify ‘‘what responsible gun ownership and safe gun storage means’’ and to reduce theft, accidental discharge and youth suicide. Foley moved the item after four community speakers urged action, citing the U.S. surgeon general’s recent declaration of gun violence as a public‑health crisis.
Speakers from Moms Demand Action and allied student groups described children and families at risk if firearms are not stored unloaded, locked and kept separate from ammunition. Dr. Cheryl Long, a retired family medicine physician, recounted a local suicide to underscore the public‑health stakes: ‘‘This could happen to any child in Orange County,’’ she said.
Opponents on the board raised concerns about privacy, enforcement and legal authority. Supervisor Chaffee said he worried about intruding into homes and asked how the measure would protect privacy rights and define penalties. A different supervisor questioned the ordinance’s reach—limited to unincorporated areas—and predicted legal challenges on Second Amendment grounds.
Supervisor Vicente Sarmiento, while supporting the idea of safe storage, dissented on the final vote citing potential federal restrictions on certain equipment and other concerns he raised earlier in the meeting.
County counsel told the board it would review constitutional issues as part of drafting. The vote sends a draft ordinance back to staff for legal review and proposed ordinance language; supervisors said they expect the draft to return to the board for further deliberation before any final adoption vote.
The board did not adopt final ordinance text on June 25; it approved only direction to prepare and return a proposed ordinance for later consideration.
