Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Accessory Structure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board approves 2,702‑sq ft accessory structure in Hillview Estates; neighbor raised grading concern

Brentwood Board of Zoning Appeals · September 15, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Board approved a 2,702 sq ft detached accessory structure in Hillview Estates (BZA2508-003). Planning staff said the parcel (about 6.83 acres) lies in the Hillside Protection Overlay and that Planning Commission previously approved the project; a neighbor emailed concerns about grading and runoff that staff said engineering has reviewed and will recheck at permit stage.

The Brentwood Board of Zoning Appeals voted to approve a 2,702‑square‑foot detached accessory structure for a property in Hillview Estates at its Sept. 15 meeting.

Planning staff (Allison) told the board that applicant Caleb Tucker seeks a detached structure that includes a 1,760‑square‑foot main floor and a 942‑square‑foot storage loft, constructed of board‑and‑batten fiber siding painted to match the main residence with a standing‑seam metal roof. Allison said the parcel is approximately 6.83 acres, is within the Hillside Protection Overlay District, and was approved by the Planning Commission on Sept. 2 with a condition that the Board of Zoning Appeals also approve the detached structure.

Caleb Tucker identified himself as the resident and told the board he had nothing further to add. A board member asked to see a larger copy of the site/topographic sheet to make the structure location clearer. Allison reported she had received a comment from a neighboring resident expressing concern about grading required for the project and potential runoff; she said engineering reviewed grading during the Planning Commission review and that grading will receive another review when the applicant applies for the building permit.

After discussion and no public testimony in the room, Eric Hook moved to approve the accessory structure; Allison seconded and the board approved the motion by voice vote.

The approval is subject to the four standard staff conditions listed in the staff report and to compliance with applicable building codes and permit requirements.