Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Council Actions topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Carlsbad council approves consent calendar, hears public objections to HDR contract and receives sinkhole detection pitch

Carlsbad City Council · February 10, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council approved consent calendar items 1–6 (including a $253,000 agreement with HDR Engineering) unanimously; a public commenter urged the council to table the HDR contract and expand the scope for balanced audits, while another speaker proposed a ground-penetrating-radar sinkhole-detection technology and offered a pro-bono demonstration.

The Carlsbad City Council unanimously approved the consent calendar (items 1–6) at its Feb. 10 meeting. Items included a proposed $253,000 agreement with HDR Engineering for Utilities Financial Services (consent item 3) and an item on which a public speaker proposed sinkhole-detection technology (consent item 4).

Public commenter Mike Barillo opposed the HDR Engineering agreement, calling it tied to what he described as unsubstantiated assumptions in the city’s climate-action planning and urging the council to table the contract until the scope included balanced audits, metrics, and cost-benefit analysis. Barillo recommended expanding HDR's scope to review alternatives and asked the council to prioritize potable-water infrastructure and ratepayer protections.

On consent item 4, speaker Brian Swords described a Japanese ground-penetrating-radar technology with a 90% market share in its domestic market that he said could detect cavitations up to six feet deep and reduce sinkhole occurrences; he offered a pro-bono demonstration and requested Public Works engagement.

The council had no additional speakers on the consent calendar, and after a brief check of items, a motion to approve consent items 1–6 passed unanimously.

Separately, the council introduced an ordinance pertaining to the Community Police Commission after a public comment from Curt Watson criticizing the commission’s limited powers; the council voted to introduce that ordinance and it passed on a unanimous procedural vote.