Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Infrastructure Planning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

City staff warns property-acquisition bottlenecks are delaying $22M in SPLOST/T-SPLOST projects

City of Albany Commission · February 17, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Planning and engineering staff told the commission that limited legal and acquisition capacity is blocking dozens of projects tied to SPLOST/T-SPLOST funds and recommended retaining acquisition counsel and a decision framework for judicial acquisition when voluntary acquisition fails.

Planning and engineering staff told the Albany City Commission on Feb. 17 that property-acquisition delays are holding up more than $22 million in SPLOST and T-SPLOST projects across the city.

Staff described a recurring pattern: smaller easements and right-of-way needs stall because the city lacks dedicated legal capacity to finalize transfers or pursue judicial acquisition when voluntary agreements expire or fail. "We have over $22,000,000 in SPLOST and T-SPLOST projects that are either currently being delayed, have had extensive delays, or will be delayed," a senior planning official said, urging a deliberate solution to avoid repeating the delays.

Presenters reviewed examples where minor property needs — for stormwater work, sidewalk easements or a groundwater monitoring well for the Albany Theater project — have prevented bids or construction even though engineering plans are complete. The consultants recommended two actions: (1) a decision framework so commissioners understand and can pre-authorize judicial acquisition in narrowly defined circumstances; and (2) retention of specialized right-of-way/property-acquisition counsel to support the city attorney’s office when negotiations stall.

Staff said the existing acquisition consultant (a retired GDOT right-of-way expert) supports engineering but the city attorney’s office does not have dedicated support for the volume of title/easement work required. Commissioners asked for a staffing analysis and for staff to present a recommended decision matrix and cost estimate for outside counsel and acquisition support. Staff promised to distribute a briefing paper and to return with specific options.