Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Ai Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Glendora students describe inappropriate AI images; board directs staff to draft clearer policy

Glendora Unified School District Board of Education · January 27, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Students from Glendora High told the school board that AI-generated explicit images of classmates were circulated; trustees agreed to direct staff to draft clearer disciplinary guidance and educational outreach, citing an existing base AI policy to be amended.

Students speaking during public comment told the Glendora Unified School District Board that AI-generated images of students had been created and shared among peers, leaving victims and families affected and seeking clearer district action and supports.

Kira Vonuzzo, a junior, told the board multiple students were “involved and impacted” by the images and asked how the district would handle those incidents and publicize support resources such as Catapult. Sophomores Sala Gonzalez and Dia Cheddi and junior Emily Flomino also urged the district to clarify consequences, educate students and families, and offer closure for victims.

Trustee Garcia thanked the students for coming forward and moved that staff be directed to draft a policy that explicitly defines consequences and supports tied to inappropriate AI-generated material. A trustee seconded the request. Superintendent Dominic DeGrazia and other trustees noted the district already has a base AI policy on responsible and ethical use and said staff could add specific language and procedures responsive to the students’ examples.

Board members emphasized the need to balance timely action with due process: the board said discipline decisions follow Education Code procedures and any formal expulsions or suspensions would follow existing legal requirements. Trustees asked staff to return with proposed policy language and implementation steps so the board could consider formal adoption.

The board did not take a final vote on a new AI policy at the meeting; trustees directed staff to prepare draft language and recommended procedures for handling incidents, outreach to victims and families, and communication about available resources.