Former speaker Kurt Dowd says periodic data‑matching program was not reinstated after COVID; lawmakers plan to press for reporting

House Prevention and State Agency Oversight Committee · March 9, 2026

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Former speaker Kurt Dowd testified that a statutory periodic data‑matching program intended to reverify eligibility for MinnesotaCare and Medical Assistance was suspended during COVID and never restarted; he cited 2019–2020 results and urged removing the reporting sunset and adding enforcement mechanisms.

Former speaker Kurt Dowd told the House Prevention and State Agency Oversight Committee that the periodic data‑matching program enacted in 2015 was implemented in 2018–2019, produced statutory reports in 2019 and 2020, and was not reinstated after the COVID‑19 emergency despite the statute remaining in force.

Dowd summarized the program's published results: the first report selected about 580,000 enrollees for checks, identified "a little over 68,000 individuals" as possibly ineligible and resulted in 22,990 terminations after the 30‑day verification window. He said that across the program's operational period roughly 37,552 ineligible people were permanently removed from public programs and called those removals a success for protecting program dollars.

"This program was never reinstated after COVID," Dowd said, urging the legislature to remove a statutory sunset and to add enforcement mechanisms so the administration cannot fail to run mandated checks. He urged lawmakers to use appropriation levers and reporting requirements to compel compliance.

Representative Lee Pinto and others noted that many of those flagged by the checks were later found to be eligible after follow‑up and that a large share did not respond to notices; lawmakers discussed the program's tradeoffs between catching ineligible recipients and the effects on low‑income people who may have difficulty responding to notices.

Representative Elkins raised a technical point that the 2019–2020 reports covered populations administered through the METS eligibility system and did not include programs still on the older MAXIS system, which limits the program's reach until legacy systems are modernized.

Committee members said a bill to repeal the sunset and add "teeth" to the reporting requirement would be introduced and pursued in the coming days; DHS did not appear at the hearing to explain why the program was not restarted.