Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Community Services Grants topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee recommends $60,000 in community services grants, prioritizing small local nonprofits
Summary
A volunteer committee recommended distributing a $60,000 pool among 18 nonprofit requests after reviewing $116,962 in applications; priorities emphasized shelters and services for vulnerable residents, while some larger charities received smaller awards because of other funding sources.
Walt Akers, who chaired the volunteer review committee, told the York County Board of Supervisors that the panel received $116,962 in requests and had $60,000 available to allocate. "We divide up the groups based on what they do and the types of activities and services they provide," Akers said, adding that organizations serving battered women and emergency shelter work received higher priority.
The panel recommended awards intended to spread limited county dollars to organizations that lack alternative funding. Examples the committee shared included a recommended $430 award to the American Red Cross, $4,000 to Avalon Center for Women and Children (emergency shelter and counseling), roughly $8,000 to Natasha House (transitional housing), and increases for some Meals on Wheels and other locally focused providers. Akers said the panel balances raw recipient counts with program significance: "It's not just the number of people that they serve, but it's also the significance of the contribution that they make." (Walt Akers, community grants committee member).
Supervisors pressed for clearer year‑over‑year service data before finalizing allocations. One board member asked whether the number of York County residents served had risen; Akers said the committee would supply the charted historical figures and the underlying spreadsheets for staff to post online. Board members also discussed whether a modest $2,080 restoration could restore several recipients to last year's funding levels; the chair asked staff to confirm a procedural route for making the small adjustment.
Why this matters: the county's grants aim to stretch limited discretionary funds to groups that provide shelter, crisis lines, food and other direct services. Supervisors framed the grants as a way to support organizations that lack other revenue sources while noting the tradeoffs of spreading a fixed pot across multiple applicants.
What happens next: staff will post the committee's report and historical application data online and implement the board's direction on minor adjustments if members conclude the additional allocation is warranted.
