Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Local Tax Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Jackson council reopens lodging‑tax vote but rejects town‑only special election on Nov. 4
Summary
After a procedural motion to reopen a June vote, Jackson's Town Council debated timing and scope of a proposed two‑cent town lodging tax; the council voted down holding a town‑only special election on Nov. 4 and directed further countywide discussions and public outreach.
Mayor Jorgensen opened the July 7 meeting by explaining a procedural mechanism to "turn the clock back" on the council's June 16 vote so members could reconsider placing a two‑cent town lodging tax before voters. The motion to reconsider passed unanimously, returning the council to the debate that preceded the June vote.
Council members repeatedly framed their concerns around timing and community buy‑in. Several said a town‑only special election in November would be costly to taxpayers and risk confusing voters; others said they preferred coordinating a countywide ballot question. "This effectively turns the clock back," Mayor Jorgensen said as the council discussed the mechanics of reconsideration and public comment.
Councilwoman Scarry made the motion to reconsider, saying she had received new information since June and wanted the council to reassess its prior direction. Multiple members said they were sympathetic to the policy goal of asking visitors to help cover tourism impacts but were uneasy about the cost and timing of a separate special election.
After extended discussion, the council took a final vote on a motion to place the town‑only lodging tax question on a Nov. 4 special election ballot; the motion failed. No formal county‑level joint ballot was approved that night; councilors said they would pursue further talks with county officials and continue public outreach before bringing the question back.
What happens next: council members said staff will continue coordinating with county officials and stakeholders to consider timing options, including bringing a countywide lodging‑tax question to a future regular election. The council did not adopt new tax language or set a new election date at the July 7 meeting.
Attendance and process notes: the motion to reconsider was procedural and allowed debate without taking public comment on the reconsideration itself; staff said public comment would be taken if the council again moved to put the tax question on the ballot.
