Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Litigation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
League City council directs staff to proceed on pending litigation related to Big League Dreams; no action on incentive offer
Summary
After a closed executive session, the council in open session directed staff to proceed on pending litigation identified in the agenda as Cause No. 25-C-0267 BigLeagueDreamsLeagueCityLLC v. League City; the motion passed 8–0. Council took no action on a proposed financial incentive for a business prospect (item 15b).
After reconvening from executive session on Feb. 10, the League City City Council in open session considered pending litigation listed on the agenda as Cause No. 25-C-0267 (BigLeagueDreamsLeagueCityLLC v. League City).
A councilmember moved that staff be directed to proceed consistent with the executive-session discussion; the motion was seconded. "Okay, move, that we direct staff to proceed as discussing second session," the councilmember motioned. The council voted and the motion passed unanimously, 8–0.
Council members also considered item 15(b), an offer of a financial or other incentive to a business prospect that seeks to locate, stay, or expand within the city of League City, but the council took no action on that item during the meeting.
The mayor stated that there was "no final action, decision, or vote with regard to matter considered in executive session just concluded," confirming that the direction to proceed was made in open session as a discrete action following the closed meeting.
The council adjourned at approximately 7:15 p.m.
