Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Grand County authorizes staff to proceed with removal of an extreme blight nuisance after years of noncompliance
Summary
Following repeated noncompliance and a $1,000 fine that went unpaid, county attorneys and community-development staff were directed to proceed with statutory authority to remove hazardous junk from a Grand Lake property and recoup costs via lien.
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Grand County commissioners directed staff Dec. 23 to proceed with removal of hazardous, long-standing blight at a property in the Grand Lake area after extensive outreach and unsuccessful enforcement efforts.
County Attorney (speaker 16) summarized the situation: repeated notices, certified mailings and in-person service had yielded no response from the property owner. The property contains unregistered vehicles, a motor home, boats, tires and household appliances that county staff characterized as a health, safety and crime hazard. Staff obtained a civil fine of $1,000 in court, which went unpaid, and now seek to use statutory authority to remove the debris, contract for cleanup (bids reported as low as $25,000), and place a lien on the property to recover costs.
Commissioners debated precedent, fairness and judicial limitations on fines. One commissioner urged caution about setting enforcement precedent; another noted the severity of the public-safety and neighbor-impact issues and supported moving forward. County Attorney outlined the administrative warrant process: apply to court for authority, provide a 10-day window for a contractor to remove material, inventory and file the inventory with the court, and place a lien to recoup county costs.
The board gave direction to proceed in this instance and asked staff to provide quarterly summaries of zoning and blight enforcement activity so commissioners can track patterns and avoid ad-hoc decisions. Staff emphasized this property was an extreme outlier that had resisted multiple remediation efforts over several years.
