Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Local Government topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Gallatin County commission approves boundary relocation, subdivision extension and consent agenda

Gallatin County Commission · December 10, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission approved a common boundary relocation for Michael Boylan, extended preliminary plat approval for Sierra Vista Phase 2 to Jan. 3, 2029, and approved the consent agenda including claims totaling $3,359,484.99 and multiple contracts.

At its Dec. 9 meeting the Gallatin County Commission approved multiple routine and land‑use items.

Consent agenda: Commissioners approved claims and warrants totaling $3,359,484.99 and several contracts and transfers read into the record, including FAA reimbursement requests, a $10,000,000 on‑call staffing contract for the rest home, a ground lease at the Gallatin County Airport and maintenance agreements for public trail easements. The consent agenda was approved by voice vote.

Boylan common boundary relocation: After a staff presentation from Emily Martinez (City of Belgrade planner) and no public comment, the commission adopted findings and approved a common boundary relocation for Michael Boylan, finding the request met subdivision exemption criteria.

Sierra Vista Phase 2 extension: Braden Lander (county planning) presented a staff report and the commission granted a three‑year extension of preliminary plat approval for Sierra Vista Phase 2 until Jan. 3, 2029, to allow RAE Water & Sewer District to finish potable water infrastructure. The applicant’s representative, Brock Asman of Allied Engineering, confirmed phase 2 was always intended to wait for water infrastructure.

These actions were taken by simple motions, second and voice votes as recorded in the meeting transcript. No financial appropriation specific to the Sierra Vista extension was recorded during the discussion.