Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Republicans push to return Climate Commitment Act funds to taxpayers or use them for transport, not special-interest spending
Summary
Republican leaders said Climate Commitment Act (CCA) revenues should be returned to taxpayers or used for transportation or working-family tax credits rather than the special-interest projects they criticized; they questioned CCA effectiveness for carbon reduction.
Reporters asked whether Climate Commitment Act (CCA) funds should be used to plug holes in the operating budget. Senate Republican leader John Braun and House Republicans said they would prefer returning the money to taxpayers or using it for transportation needs or the working-families tax credit rather than what they described as Democrat-directed special-interest spending.
Braun said his preference would be “send it back to the people of the state in some sort of tax reform,” and that if CCA funds were to be spent he would prioritize transportation projects or using the funds to help offset other taxes. Chris Corey called the CCA “the most regressive … tax that the Democrats have passed in the last few years” and said combined charges can add substantially to gasoline costs.
Stokesberry added examples from his district—CCA-funded climate planners and an EV charger at an upscale apartment complex—and questioned the projects’ carbon-reduction benefit. All three Republican leaders urged greater transparency and said that if the money cannot be returned, they would favor investments tied to direct public benefit such as transportation or targeted credits.
