Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Performance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Rowland Unified spotlights WIN interventions, family-readers pilot and dual-language growth in midyear LCAP update
Summary
The district's midyear LCAP update showed chronic absenteeism falling from 22.5% to 14.5%, low suspension rates and gains in ELA and math; presenters highlighted WIN interventions at Jellick, a Roland family‑readers volunteer pilot and exploration of TK–8 conversions for dual-language sites.
Get email alerts on the Education Performance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Rowland Unified officials presented a midyear Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP) update on Feb. 26 that combined statewide dashboard metrics with three site-level "spotlight" initiatives: WIN ("Whatever I Need") elementary interventions, family-engagement pilots that train parents as reading tutors, and expansion/retention plans for the district's dual-language immersion programs.
Dr. Brian Hupp summarized statewide dashboard data posted in December and district trends: chronic absenteeism fell from 22.5% to 14.5%, suspension rates remain low (about 2%–2.2%), and the district reported modest gains in English language arts (0.8 percentage points since baseline) and mathematics (2.5 points). He said science is newly posted on the dashboard (52.7 points) and noted the importance of disaggregating outcomes for groups such as English learners, long-term English learners and foster youth. "For foster youth, it’s a very small subgroup (about 60–80 students) but a high-need one," he said, noting the district is targeting chronic absenteeism and suspension for that cohort.
Spotlight: WIN interventions. Sylvia Rivas and Jellick Elementary Principal Johan Schmidt described WIN time as an in-class, data-driven block that provides targeted small-group instruction. "WIN is not just for struggling students," Schmidt said. "It ensures every student receives targeted intervention support, on-grade-level support, as well as enrichment." Schmidt reported measurable gains after implementing WIN: schoolwide CAASPP gains (a 13% gain in ELA and a 6% gain in math in the period he reviewed) and double-digit growth at several grade levels. The school moved from pullout intervention to embedded, flexible groups assessed every 10 days, and staffing adjustments (additional intervention teachers and rostering of students into general-education classrooms) supported that shift.
Spotlight: family engagement and Roland Family Readers. Assistant Superintendent Marion Kim and Killian Principal Maria Descalor described district work to define family engagement and pilot a volunteer-reader model. At Roemer, an initial run saw 8 of 9 participating students meet or exceed goals; Killian planned a parent training session and a mid‑March launch with five committed parent tutors. Kim said the effort grew from evening workshops where parents and staff co-created a district definition of engagement rooted in trust and shared decision-making.
Dual-language immersion and TK–8 exploration. Presenters reviewed the district’s Spanish and Mandarin immersion models (an 80/20 early-years model that phases toward 50/50 by upper elementary grades), awards and site-level supports. The board and staff discussed exploring TK–8 conversions for some dual-language elementary sites to reduce attrition at the middle-school transition; staff outlined an exploration roadmap of parent surveys, facility and staffing analyses and phased options (e.g., adding seventh then eighth grade), noting facilities and staffing constraints and that conversions would be gradual and contingent on feasibility.
Why it matters: The LCAP frames district spending and program decisions around equity and outcomes for students who are historically underserved. The presentation combined districtwide metrics with concrete site practices (WIN, parent tutors, and bilingual pathways) that district leaders argued are driving measurable improvements.
What was not specified: The presentation included several data points (attendance rates, percentage changes, and foster-youth headcounts) but did not present a line-item budget tied to each initiative during the session; the transcript does not include detailed budget allocations or timelines for scaling every highlighted program.
