Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Henderson City Council adopts revisions to Minimum Housing Standards, removes proposed point-of-contact clause
Summary
Council unanimously approved Ordinance 22-14 to amend Chapter 21 (Minimum Housing Standards) to allow enforcement in the ETJ; the council removed a proposed subsection (f) on a required point-of-contact for owners and occupants pending further legal guidance.
The Henderson City Council voted unanimously on Aug. 8 to adopt Ordinance 22-14 amending Chapter 21 of the City Code (Minimum Housing Standards). The approved revisions extend the city’s code-compliance authority into the extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) and modify owner/occupant responsibilities; Council removed a proposed subsection (f) under Sec. 21-10 (a requested point-of-contact/authorized agent) at legal staff recommendation pending guidance from the North Carolina School of Government.
City Manager Edward Blackmon said the amendment effort began months earlier and had been reviewed at a July special meeting. Development Services Director Corey Williams told Council that emergency repairs require a hearing with the Board of Adjustment or Council before the City can proceed with repairs, and that timelines for completing repairs can be affected by contractor availability. Williams said about 60–70% of landlords typically respond "in a timely manner." Council members debated whether a 72-hour repair timeline was sufficiently rapid for emergency situations; staff said the City’s intent is to complete emergency repairs as quickly as possible and that, when a quorum is available, the City Clerk could schedule a meeting within 24 hours to authorize emergency repairs.
Council Member Melissa Elliott moved approval of Ordinance 22-14 with removal of section (f) under Sec. 21-10; Council Member Sara M. Coffey seconded. The motion passed unanimously: YES — Williams, Coffey, Noel, Rainey, Elliott, Daeke, Thorpe-Cooper and Spriggs; NO/ABSTAIN/ABSENT — none. The ordinance is recorded in Ordinance Book 10, p. 927.
The City Attorney advised removing the proposed point-of-contact clause until the office could obtain additional guidance from the School of Government. Council did not specify an immediate replacement for that subsection; staff said the section can be reconsidered and returned to Council after legal clarification.
