Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Additional Dwellings topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Canton approves rules to allow additional dwellings in town limits
Summary
After a public hearing, the Town of Canton Board voted unanimously to allow ‘additional dwellings’ on properties within town limits with standards for lot size, setbacks and a variance process; permitting will involve both town staff and Haywood County.
Get email alerts on the Zoning Additional Dwellings topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Town of Canton Board of Aldermen/women on Dec. 12 voted to permit additional dwellings within town limits under a set of standards the board modified after a public hearing.
Byron Hickox, who presented the ordinance language at the hearing, explained the purpose and criteria for additional dwellings, including minimum lot sizes, setbacks and the town’s role in permitting. Hickox said attached and detached garages could qualify as additional dwellings under the proposed language but noted the board could set limits on those conversions to avoid on-street parking problems.
Alderwoman Proctor asked whether detached and attached garages would be treated as additional dwellings; Hickox said both could be considered and that permits would be issued by town staff and Haywood County. Zachary Stines questioned the 900-square-foot minimum and appealed for clarity; Carl Cartwright emphasized the need for a size cap so accessory units would not abut the primary residence.
After discussion about property values, tax addresses and an appeals/variance process, Alderwoman Mull moved to adopt the ordinance with modifications and Alderwoman Proctor seconded. All members voted in favor.
The ordinance requires applicants to meet lot‑size and setback standards and allows a variance process through the town when strict compliance would be impractical. The board did not specify a change to tax assessment procedures; Hickox said additional dwellings will receive separate addresses. The motion passed on a unanimous voice vote.
