Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Charlotte County Planning Commission directs staff to draft conditional-use rules for car dealerships and livestock markets
Summary
The Charlotte County Planning Commission voted Oct. 25 to direct staff to draft zoning changes reclassifying car dealerships and livestock markets as conditional uses in specified districts, citing impacts and recent rural applications; both motions passed unanimously among voting members present.
Get email alerts on the Zoning Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Charlotte County Planning Commission on Oct. 25 voted to ask staff to draft changes to the zoning ordinance that would move car dealerships and livestock markets from by-right uses to conditional uses in several zoning districts.
Vice-Chairman Cornell Goldman opened the meeting and the commission then heard a staff report about Article 9 items. According to staff, the review included a comparison of regulations used by nearby localities and a look at state code requirements for car dealerships. "Staff reviewed local ordinances and state requirements and presented that context to the commission," the staff report stated.
Committee member David Watkins moved to direct staff to prepare draft language that would reclassify car dealerships as conditional uses in the General Agricultural, Village Center and General Industrial districts; Committee member Patrick Andrews seconded. The motion carried with all voting members present supporting it.
Committee member Kenny Howard then moved to direct staff to prepare draft language to reclassify livestock markets as conditional uses in the General Agricultural and Intensive Agricultural districts; Committee member David Watkins seconded. That motion likewise carried with all voting members present in favor.
The motions do not themselves change the ordinance; they direct staff to prepare draft text and any required public-notice materials. The commission said the changes were prompted by concerns about impacts from recent applications in rural areas and the need to align local rules with state code and neighboring localities' practices.
The commission did not vote on final ordinance language at the meeting; any draft language will be scheduled for future public review and hearings before the commission and, if forwarded, at subsequent Board of Supervisors consideration.
