Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Behavioral Health topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Justice and behavioral-health officials tell Fulton County commissioners diversion programs have reduced local jailings
Summary
Representatives from the justice system and behavioral-health partners told commissioners that a mental health court co-responder and a recovery supports navigator have increased deferrals to community-based treatment and coincided with fewer people jailed at the Bedford County Correctional Facility, producing 'measurable cost savings' for the county; the minutes do not specify numeric reductions or dollar savings.
Get email alerts on the Behavioral Health topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At the Jan. 20 Fulton County Board of Commissioners meeting, representatives from the justice system and behavioral-health partners briefed the board on recent diversion and treatment-support initiatives and reported a measurable decline in local jailings.
Officials described new and strengthened initiatives — including a mental health court co-responder and a recovery supports navigator — that they said have increased deferrals to community-based treatment resources. According to the presentation recorded in the minutes, these changes have coincided with "a notable reduction in the number of individuals incarcerated at the Bedford County Correctional Facility," which the presenters said yielded "measurable cost savings" for the county; the minutes do not provide numeric counts or dollar amounts for those reductions or savings.
The presenters told commissioners that the initiatives are supported through blended funding from county mental-health resources and grants from the Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency. They recommended next steps that include mapping available resources to support training efforts and exploring supported housing options for people exiting the criminal-justice system.
The meeting minutes record this update as informational; commissioners did not adopt any new ordinance or budget item during the meeting related to the briefing. Because the presentation did not include detailed metrics in the minutes, the precise scale of the reported reductions and savings is not specified in the meeting record.
