Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Solar Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Charlotte County Planning Commission votes 4-3 to continue solar application reviews without amending comprehensive plan
Summary
The Planning Commission on May 23 voted 4-3 to review three pending solar applications under the existing comprehensive plan rather than amend the plan now to incorporate a new solar policy; commissioners debated timing, potential extensions and procedural impacts on 2232 reviews.
The Charlotte County Planning Commission voted 4-3 on May 23 to continue reviewing three pending solar project applications under the county’s existing comprehensive plan instead of amending the plan now to incorporate a new solar policy.
County staff told commissioners that the draft comprehensive plan was unlikely to be adopted before the pending applications reached the comprehensive plan compliance review (commonly referred to as the 2232 review), and asked whether the Commission wished to amend the current plan to incorporate solar policy immediately. After discussion of procedural options, timelines and the possibility of obtaining extensions for 2232 reviews from the Board of Supervisors, Commissioner Cornell Goldman moved to proceed with application reviews under the existing plan; Commissioner Patrick Andrews seconded the motion.
The motion passed on a roll-call vote: Cornell Goldman — Yes; Patrick Andrews — Yes; David Watkins — No; Miller Adams — No; Eugene Wells — Yes; James Benn — No; Chairman Andrew Carwile — Yes (motion carried 4-3).
Commissioners discussed the trade-offs between adopting a formal solar policy ahead of pending applications and reviewing those applications under current rules. Supporters of delaying an amendment said it would allow staff and the Commission to review the incoming applications promptly without the uncertainty of mid-review policy changes; those opposed raised concerns that applicants might proceed without the guardrails a new policy would provide.
A procedural point noted during discussion was that the Board of Supervisors can grant extensions to the 2232 review period, which could affect scheduling and the timing of any future plan amendment. Staff indicated three new solar applications currently are under staff review and that the Commission is actively working on solar policy as part of the comprehensive plan update.
The decision means staff will continue the application-completeness and substantive reviews under existing comprehensive-plan rules; the Commission did not adopt new policy language at the May 23 meeting. The Commission confirmed the approvals of the evening’s agenda and minutes earlier in the meeting and adjourned after staff updates.
