Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Election Administration Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Charlotte County electoral board reviews proposed 2021-22 budget, flags staffing and equipment costs
Summary
County election officials reviewed the proposed fiscal 2021-22 budget, discussing two added early‑voting assistants, suggested use of Officers of Election to save money, laptop purchases possibly covered by CTCL grant funds, and budget pressure from expanded absentee voting and pending drop‑box legislation.
The Charlotte County Electoral Board met at 2:00 p.m. Thursday, Feb. 25, 2021, at the County Administration building to review the proposed fiscal year 2021–22 budget. County Administrator Dan Witt and County Financial Director Norma Tuck led the review with the Interim Registrar and board members Lawrence Clark and Glenwood Foster.
Witt and Tuck pointed to specific items they expected the Board of Supervisors to question, and urged the registrar and board to eliminate unnecessary spending given the county’s financial situation. Witt suggested using grant funds for some purchases to limit county outlays.
One notable line-item the board discussed was staffing for early voting. The Interim Registrar included two additional assistants in the draft budget aimed at supporting extended early‑voting operations; board members suggested staffing those duties with Officers of Election instead to conserve funds. Supervisors planned to contact comparable counties to see how many assistants others budget for early voting.
The budget also lists purchased services such as laptops for electoral board members. Witt suggested the board consider using CTCL grant funds (CTCL is cited in the transcript) to pay for laptops because many meetings and training now occur via Zoom.
Mr. Goode said some increases in the draft budget are attributable to 45‑day absentee voting for each election, identifying the extended absentee period as a driver of higher costs. Board members additionally noted that pending legislation on ballot drop boxes and requirements for security cameras could create further expenditures if enacted; the transcript records the possibility but does not specify the scope or timing of any new requirements.
No motions or votes were recorded in the transcript. Board members indicated the Board of Supervisors and county staff would follow up—Supervisors by contacting other counties for comparisons and staff by reviewing budget items—before formal action on the budget.
The Electoral Board continued its review but took no formal votes during the recorded segment.
