Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Agriculture topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Suffolk lawmakers move to consolidate agricultural districts; several parcel enrollments draw public comment
Summary
County staff proposed consolidating five agricultural districts into a single district with one anniversary and review date; staff said the change is administrative and does not alter State rules on minimum acreage. Dozens of parcel-inclusion hearings took place; most were uncontested, but one application (Butter Lane) drew neighbor objections tied to prior zoning disputes and pending town-level issues.
Suffolk County staff and advocates described a plan to consolidate multiple county agricultural districts into a single, countywide district at the Legislature’s June 3 meeting, saying the change simplifies administration and places all ag parcels on a single review schedule.
"We're essentially trying to do two things," Michael Kerr, the county's Farmland Open Space administrator, told the Legislature. He said the consolidation would (1) replace staggered anniversary/review schedules with a single date and (2) remove parcels that are no longer viable for agriculture because they have been subdivided or developed.
Kerr said the proposal does not change New York State Ag & Markets statutory requirements such as acreage thresholds; it is an administrative reorganization and a routine eight-year review under State law.
Most parcel-inclusion requests heard that afternoon were recommended by the Farmland Protection Board and described as supporting bona fide agriculture. Long Island Farm Bureau Director Rob Carpenter urged approval and commended county staff for an extensive review.
One contested application drew extended comment. Neighbors around the "Butter Lane" property urged the Legislature to defer any inclusion until local disputes and town-level approvals are final. Neighbor Martha Reichert cited outstanding litigation and argued the county should not advance inclusion while Town of Southampton zoning and private easement disputes remain unresolved.
The Legislature held public hearings on many parcels (the transcript records multiple PM items) and closed those hearings for committee consideration; county staff said any county action would still be subject to State review under Ag & Markets law.
Why it matters Inclusion in an Ag District gives property owners certain protections under New York State law — for example the right to be notified if a municipality considers regulations that might affect farming — and can protect agricultural operations from some local restriction changes. Consolidation simplifies county administration of that program, the county said.
What’s next The Legislature recessed or closed the hearings and will consider the Farmland Protection Board recommendations in committee. Any legislative approval will still be routed to the New York State Commissioner of Agriculture for final certification under Ag & Markets Law.
Provenance: topic intro at SEG 2095; contested Butter Lane discussion at SEG 2499–SEG 2746.
