Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Water Infrastructure And Human Services topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Minnehaha Community Water Corp. reports record daily use; county hears updates on Head Start, heating assistance and pandemic aid

Minnehaha County Commission · March 1, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Minnehaha Community Water Corporation told the commission it saw a record single-day usage of 6,817,000 gallons and outlined plans for new storage towers and a treatment partnership; Inter-Lakes Community Action Partnership described full Head Start enrollment and ongoing housing and pandemic-related aid.

Minnehaha Community Water Corporation Executive Director Scott Buss told the Minnehaha County Commission on Oct. 19 that the utility recorded a single-day peak of 6,817,000 gallons on June 8, 2021 and is facing supply-and-demand challenges.

Buss outlined long-range planning that includes constructing two storage towers and partnering with Big Sioux Community Water on a new treatment facility to address future demand. The presentation emphasized system planning; no formal vote was required.

Inter-Lakes Community Action Partnership representatives Cindy Dannenbring and Tammie Denning briefed the commission on a year of client services: Head Start is at capacity with a waiting list; the organization distributed heating-assistance funds, supported Volunteer Income Tax Assistance (VITA) volunteers, and provided pandemic-related support such as rent, mortgage and utility assistance, mobile phone payment help and food vouchers.

Why it matters: water-system capacity affects developers and residents across the county; capacity-constrained social programs and Head Start waiting lists signal continuing demand for early childhood and basic-needs services.

The county did not take action on the water presentation; follow-up or procurement decisions would be addressed in separate proceedings if staff and commissioners decide to pursue the construction or partnership proposals.