Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Policy Evaluation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Covington commissioners direct departments to evaluate CCA Initiative’s financial and safety impacts; Acri recuses, motion passes 2–1

Board of Commissioners, City of Covington, Kentucky · November 18, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Commissioner James Toebbe moved on Nov. 18 to direct the Police, Fire and Public Works departments to evaluate financial and safety factors of the CCA Initiative before any ordinance implementation; the motion passed 2–1 with Commissioner Tim Acri recorded as recused for conflict of interest.

A motion to direct city departments to evaluate the financial and safety implications of the "CCA Initiative" passed the Covington Board of Commissioners on Nov. 18 by a 2–1 vote, with one commissioner recorded as recused.

Commissioner James Toebbe moved to instruct the Police Department, Fire Department and Public Works Department to begin evaluating financial and safety factors to ensure that, if the CCA Initiative were implemented by ordinance, it would be self-supporting and not sustained by residents’ tax dollars. Mayor Ronald L. Washington seconded the motion; Commissioner Tim Acri is recorded in the minutes as recusing himself because of a conflict of interest. The motion passed by a 2–1 vote (the minutes record one commissioner opposed). The motion is a directive to staff to evaluate options and is not an adoption of policy or ordinance.

The minutes include an internal inconsistency in the printed roll call text for this item; the Commission’s recorded outcome is a 2–1 passage with Commissioner Acri recused. The directive charges three departments with preparing evaluations that would inform any future ordinance consideration; no dates for staff reports were recorded in the minutes. The commission took this direction as part of general commissioner discussion and did not adopt an implementing ordinance at the meeting.

Why it matters: The CCA Initiative was not adopted, but the commission’s direction begins a staff-level review of both fiscal and safety impacts, which could shape whether and how the initiative proceeds to formal ordinance language and a future vote.