Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Fleet Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Spencer County Fiscal Court declares equipment surplus but rejects expedited police-vehicle purchase authorization
Summary
The court declared several mowers and vehicles surplus and listed them for auction, but rejected a magistrate's request to pre-authorize purchases of replacement police vehicles. A motion to let the county purchase vehicles up to $20,000 failed on a 1–5 roll-call vote.
Get email alerts on the Fleet Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Spencer County Fiscal Court declared multiple pieces of county equipment surplus and approved auction disposal, but the court denied a magistrate's request to authorize expedited purchases of police vehicles.
Esq. J. Moody moved to declare two John Deere mowers and a 2010 Ford F-150 surplus; the court approved the declaration and set an online auction date of Sept. 30. A subsequent motion also declared two Crown Victorias and two Dodge Chargers surplus for disposal on GovDeals.com.
Esq. J. Moody explained that the sheriff's office sought replacement vehicles and requested authority for quicker purchases—he said he needed flexibility to buy low-mileage used units and asked for authorization to spend up to $20,000 per vehicle or up to $80,000 for four units, with the sheriff expected to reimburse the county from seized-property sale proceeds. Judge Riley and several magistrates questioned whether Fiscal Court should pre-authorize that level of spending without clear funding and procurement safeguards.
On a roll-call vote on a motion to authorize Esq. J. Moody to purchase one vehicle for up to $20,000, only Esq. J. Moody voted aye; Magistrates Brewer, M. Moody, Beaverson, Judge Riley and Magistrate Travis voted no. The motion failed 1–5. Judge Riley stated that purchases exceeding $30,000 require a bid process and emphasized the court could not transfer authority to commit larger sums without clear appropriations.
The court recorded that some sheriff's office funds (proceeds from a seized-house sale) may be available to replace vehicles but noted that purchases using Sheriff's funds do not require Fiscal Court approval. The court directed that surplused vehicles be turned over for sale so proceeds and inventory could be processed.
The motions to declare surplus property passed; the request to pre-authorize vehicle purchases did not.
