Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident says she received $260 fine after alleged 911-address error; commissioners say they will investigate address and billing
Summary
At the Sept. 23 work session resident Christine Richards said she was fined $260 after not receiving a court warning and reported her 911 address had been recorded incorrectly; County Manager Thomas Weaver said the commission cannot reverse judge-imposed fines but staff will examine 911 signage and water billing.
Get email alerts on the Public Comment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At the Unified Government work session on Sept. 23, resident Christine Richards addressed the commission about a $260 fine she said stemmed from a court appearance she did not receive notice of. Richards said her property’s 911 address had been recorded as 145 for two years though her actual address is 140, and she said she suspects a sign contractor’s error. She told the board she is on a fixed income and asked where the money went.
County Manager Thomas Weaver told Richards that the commission cannot reverse fines imposed by the courts but said staff could investigate the 911 sign, the address record, and any water-billing issues Richards reported. Chairman Charles Coffey confirmed staff would look into the 911 sign and address; Commissioners also asked follow-up questions about water billing and court notice procedures.
The minutes record that Richards initially thought she had the wrong address and that the county would examine whether the address sign or related process caused the mailing problem. No formal action or vote was recorded on the matter; the minutes note staff follow-up will occur.
