Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the It Upgrade topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Spencer County approves clerk's IT upgrade and software contract; some magistrates question vendor competition
Summary
Fiscal Court approved purchase of new hardware for the county clerk's office and annual software licenses from Software Management, LLC. The package includes a $25,536 hardware purchase and $31,224 in annual licensing/service fees; some magistrates asked why additional bids were not obtained.
Spencer County Fiscal Court voted on March 15 to accept a proposal from Software Management, LLC to upgrade computer hardware and license software for the county clerk’s office.
The contract details presented at the meeting called for a one-time hardware purchase of $25,536 (Dell and related equipment) and annual software/service fees the vendor listed at $31,224 (an itemized monthly equivalent of $2,602). Software Management representatives said their product suite and services (including remote access, hosted eCCLIX online records lookup and monitoring) are in use in other Kentucky clerk offices; the firm’s representative told the court they serve about 80 county clerks statewide.
Clerk Lynn Hesselbrock explained the project includes migration to a new hosting provider and the replacement of aging equipment. During questioning, some magistrates asked whether the county had sought competing bids for the equipment and services. Stuart Baird of Software Management responded that some vendors provide parts of the needed software but, he said, no other vendor offered the full suite the county used; he also described tradeoffs between leasing equipment and buying it outright.
Magistrate J. Moody pressed whether other vendors could supply comparable hardware; county staff and the vendor said the quoted package met the clerk office’s configuration needs and that alternatives would require separate software integration. The court ultimately approved buying the hardware and accepting the annual license/service arrangement by roll-call vote.
Why it matters: The project centralizes records access and changes the clerk office’s IT hosting and phone systems; the annual licensing cost will become a recurring budget item for the county. Several magistrates explicitly questioned procurement options and potential long-term obligations under lease arrangements.
What’s next: County staff will implement the migration and on-site training for clerk staff; the vendor’s maintenance and licensing fees recur annually and will be reflected in future budgets.
