Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Spencer County Fiscal Court approves four zoning changes, denies two at July meeting
Summary
At its July 19 meeting, Spencer County Fiscal Court approved four rezoning requests and denied two, recording roll-call votes on contested parcels and receiving public comment challenging Planning & Zoning representation and local vehicle maintenance practices.
Spencer County Fiscal Court on July 19 approved four rezoning applications, voted down two others and heard public comment questioning the composition and oversight of the county's Planning & Zoning board.
The Court denied a rezoning request filed by Anna F. Chesser (for Darris Chesser) to change 2.49 acres at 235 Grays Run Road from AG‑1 (agricultural) to R‑3 (residential). The motion to deny was made by Magistrate Jerry Moody and seconded by Magistrate Mike Moody; the roll-call vote was five in favor of denial and one opposed (Judge John Riley voted "nay").
The Court approved the following rezoning requests on motions recorded in the minutes: Andrea Cantu (Ag‑1 to R‑1 on a 0.71‑acre tract on Plum Creek Road), Rebecca L. Wilson (R‑2 to R‑1 on 3.00 acres at 2818 Taylorsville Road), and Darrell Patterson (Ag‑1 to Ag‑2 on a 5.036‑acre tract in the 1100 block of Dutchman Creek Road). Motions to approve those items carried by roll call with all present voting "aye."
Magistrate Jim Travis moved, and Magistrate Jerry Moody seconded, the Court's decision to deny Nicole Ruth Development LLC's petition to rezone 21 acres on Wills Way in Top Flight Landing from R‑1 to R‑2. The roll-call vote again recorded five ayes and a single nay from Judge Riley.
The meeting included public comment from resident Lawrence Trageser, who asked why Planning & Zoning is composed of eight members split evenly between city and county appointments despite the county's substantially larger population, and who raised a related concern about a county vehicle. Trageser asked why the county "footed the bill for P&Z entirely, yet the City had 50% control over it." Bill Drury, who took three minutes surrendered by Tracy Cox, told the Court members they must consider whether a proposed change is a "significant change" when evaluating rezoning requests and submitted aerial photographs and neighborhood comparisons as part of the record.
The Court's clerk posted a first-reading notice for proposed amendments to Article V of the Taylorsville‑Spencer County Zoning Regulations (dimensional requirements for residential lots), with a public hearing/second-reading planned for August 16, 2021.
The Court's action on rezoning matters was recorded in the minutes with motions, seconders, and the roll‑call tallies. The Clerk's published notices and the Court's formal minutes list the applications, the motions, and the findings of the Planning and Zoning board on which the Court relied.
What happens next: Applicants denied today may pursue further administrative or legal options provided by local code; the amended Article V will return for second reading on August 16.
