Citizen Portal

Get email alerts on the Government Administration topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Simpson County moves IT into standalone county department after closed session

Simpson County Fiscal Court · March 1, 2026

Summary

Following a closed session under KRS 61.810(1)(f), the Simpson County Fiscal Court voted to make Information Technology a separate county department to centralize IT and cybersecurity responsibilities.

After a closed session on personnel matters, the Simpson County Fiscal Court voted March 7 to make Information Technology (IT) its own county department.

The court entered closed session at 9:11 a.m. under KRS 61.810(1)(f) for discussions that might lead to appointment, discipline, or dismissal of an individual and returned at 9:35 a.m. Immediately after reconvening, magistrates approved a motion to establish IT as a standalone department. The motion was recorded as approved without recorded dissent.

Judge/Executive Mason Bames had urged fellow magistrates and department heads to review proposed Information Technology & Cybersecurity Policies that will be included in the county's Administrative Code. Bames told the court compliance with the IT and cybersecurity policies will be necessary to maintain the county's cybersecurity insurance with KACo. County Attorney Sam Phillips told the court he reviewed the proposed IT policy and recommended minor changes.

No additional procedural details about staffing, budget, or implementation timeline for the new department were specified in the minutes; the court recorded only the motion to create the department and the direction to include the policies in county administrative code.

AI generated

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

Source