Sumter County officials meet Shaw AFB leadership about groundwater contamination; county seeks more information

Sumter County Council · March 1, 2026

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

County leaders told the council they met with Shaw Air Force Base leadership on July 14 about groundwater contamination; the base described a three‑phase plan to identify chemicals, remove PFAS by filtration and implement prevention measures, and county officials are in a fact‑finding stage and may engage the legislative delegation.

Sumter County leaders reported they met on July 14 with Shaw Air Force Base leadership, including the wing commander identified as Colonel Smith, to discuss groundwater contamination that may affect areas around the base.

Chairman James T. McCain Jr. said the commander’s engineering team described a three-phase mitigation approach: (1) identify chemicals historically used for fuel-fire suppression and burn‑pit operations; (2) identify PFAS releases and design water‑filtration systems to remove those chemicals before returning water to the groundwater system; and (3) establish prevention and protection measures to limit future contamination. Councilman Eugene R. Baten recalled community concerns dating to the 1970s and said residents want tests extended as far back as available records permit.

Councilman Carlton B. Washington said the group is still "peeling the apple back" and emphasized Sumter County is currently in a fact‑finding phase; he invited Councilman Baten to participate in future meetings and said outreach to the legislative delegation remains an option as the inquiry proceeds.

Resident George Bates raised similar questions during the public‑comment period, asking council to press Shaw on how far back testing will go, what radius is being sampled and the depth of testing. No formal county directive to pursue litigation or specific remedial work was recorded at the meeting; county leaders described ongoing engagement and information‑gathering.