Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Rezoning Mhp Cd topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Green Level Council unanimously approves two rezoning and development agreements for proposed manufactured-housing parcels

Green Level Town Council · March 14, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Green Level Town Council voted 5-0 March 14 to rezone 2156 James Boswell Road and 2648 & 2606 E. Simpson Road from R-12 to R-MHP-CD and approved accompanying development agreements after applicant counsel presented the proposals.

The Green Level Town Council voted unanimously March 14 to approve two rezoning applications and their development agreements, changing three parcels from R-12 single-family zoning to R-MHP-CD, a district for manufactured-housing park developments. Mayor Remonia Enoch opened public hearings for each application and attorney Robin Tatum of Fox Rothschild spoke on behalf of the applicants, requesting council approval of the rezonings and the submitted development agreements.

The first hearing concerned 2156 James Boswell Road. Councilmember Michael Trollinger moved to approve the consistency statement, the rezoning application and the development agreement; Councilmember Hosea McBroom seconded, and the motion passed 5-0. The council then closed the public hearing by mutual consent.

The second hearing covered 2648 and 2606 E. Simpson Road. Tatum again represented the applicants and asked the council to approve the rezoning and development agreement. Councilmember Trollinger moved and Councilmember Stephanie Enoch seconded approval; the motion passed unanimously (5-0) and the public hearing was closed.

Why it matters: rezoning to R-MHP-CD enables the applicants to pursue a planned development tailored for manufactured housing, subject to conditions in the development agreements approved by the council. The transcript does not record substantive public opposition at either hearing; no ballots or permit conditions beyond the agreements themselves were described during the meeting.

What’s next: the council’s approvals allow the applicants to proceed under the approved development agreements and any required permitting steps. The council did not record further amendments or conditions on either rezoning during the meeting.

Quotes and sources: attorney Robin Tatum requested the council "approve the rezoning application and the submitted development agreement" for both matters. The votes on each item were recorded in the meeting minutes as unanimous (5-0).