Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Planning And Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Fiscal court sends proposed subdivision road-width and curbing rules to Planning & Zoning
Summary
After debate over costs and stormwater/runoff concerns, the court voted 5–1 to forward new subdivision language requiring either curbing or wider pavement (22-foot pavement plus 2-foot shoulders each side) to the Planning & Zoning Commission for review and possible adoption.
The court considered proposed changes to the Spencer County Subdivision Regulations that would require new county roads to have either curbing or increased pavement width (Judge Travis described the standard as 22 feet of pavement plus two feet of gravel on each side, for a total of 26 feet). Members discussed tradeoffs: developers likely will pass costs to buyers, wider gravel shoulders may not be acceptable to all members, and runoff control or drainage impacts must be considered.
Judge Travis and other members referenced prior work with the county's engineering consultant QK4 and expressed concern about cost and practicality. Esquire Eldridge moved to send the document with the added street/curbing language to Planning & Zoning for further review; the vote passed 5–1 (Esq. Travis opposed). The Planning & Zoning Commission will review ROW landscaping plans, sight-distance verification, and any required additional right-of-way dedication under the proposed language.
The referral does not itself change the ordinance; it routes the proposal to the planning body for a formal review and recommendation to the fiscal court at a later date.
