Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Rezoning Otley topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Marion County supervisors hold hearing, approve first reading to rezone Otley property for event venue

Marion County Board of Supervisors · March 1, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Marion County Board of Supervisors opened a public hearing and approved the first reading of Zoning Map Ordinance 2026-1 to rezone 1956 Clemens St., Otley (Parcel 1329201000) from A-1 Agricultural to C‑A (R) Commercial Ag (Restricted), allowing a commercial event venue; no public comments were received.

The Marion County Board of Supervisors opened a public hearing at 9:02 a.m. Feb. 10 on Proposed Zoning Map Ordinance 2026-1 and approved the ordinance’s first reading to rezone a parcel at 1956 Clemens St., Otley (Parcel 1329201000) from A‑1 Agricultural to C‑A (R) Commercial Ag (Restricted). Chair Kisha Jahner opened the hearing and a site plan presentation was included in the hearing record. No members of the public spoke during the hearing.

Supervisor Steve McCombs moved to close the public hearing and to approve the first reading of the ordinance; Chair Kisha Jahner seconded the motion. The motion carried with aye votes from McCombs and Jahner; Supervisor Jim Mueller was recorded as absent. The property owner listed in the record is SBS Enterprises LLC.

The rezoning request would allow the parcel to be used as a commercial event venue under Marion County’s C‑A (R) zoning classification. The transcript notes that a site plan presentation was part of the public hearing record; specifics of the site plan, permit conditions, or any required county reviews beyond the first reading were not specified in the minutes. The first reading was approved; the transcript does not record a final adoption vote or any conditions added at this meeting.

The board’s next procedural steps for the ordinance (timing of additional readings, public notice, or required planning commission actions) were not specified in the meeting record. The board adjourned at 9:47 a.m.