Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ordinance 2023 01 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Snowflake council approves first reading of code update that would allow some RVs, restrict single‑wide mobile homes
Summary
On first reading the Snowflake Town Council approved Ordinance 2023-01, a town code update that would allow RVs in some situations, tighten rules on single‑wide mobile homes (requiring a council variance), and modernize definitions and penalties; final approval is scheduled after a March 7 hearing.
Get email alerts on the Ordinance 2023 01 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Snowflake Town Council on Feb. 7 approved the first reading of Ordinance 2023-01, a revision to the town code that would allow recreational vehicles in certain circumstances, require council variances to permit single‑wide mobile homes, and update definitions and penalties.
Town staffer Brian Richards said the amendment has been published and was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission; it will return for further consideration on March 7 before a final council vote. "We had a consultant that helped us with this, and our attorney advised us on how to keep up with state statutes and keeping in line with other communities," Richards said.
Councilmember Byron Lewis said the changes are intended to preserve the town's character while allowing for designated areas such as trailer parks. "We want to keep Snowflake, Snowflake, and have designated areas for things like the trailer park," Lewis said.
The motion to approve the first reading was made by Councilmember Joseph Bjornn and seconded by JoAnne Guderian; the motion passed unanimously with one councilor (Cory Johnson) absent. The ordinance text circulated for first reading would require any single‑wide mobile home to receive a variance from the council and otherwise would permit RVs where the revised code specifies.
Supporters of the changes told the council the updates bring local code into closer alignment with other jurisdictions and reflect recent legal review. Opponents were not recorded in the hearing as mounting a formal objection at first reading. The ordinance will be discussed again at the March 7 meeting for final approval or additional amendments.
