Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Transportation Safety topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

GDOT seeks Ware County support for RCUT at SR 520/SR 122; commissioners press for signal or overpass analysis

Ware County Board of Commissioners · August 11, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

GDOT presented a Restricted Crossing U-Turn (RCUT) proposal for SR 520 at SR 122 and said the intersection does not meet traffic-signal warrants; commissioners raised concerns about truck access and asked whether the County should support or seek alternative solutions including an overpass.

Daniel Summers of the Georgia Department of Transportation briefed the Ware County Board on a proposed Restricted Crossing U-Turn (RCUT) at the SR 520 and SR 122 intersection, which GDOT said is intended to reduce crashes by rerouting left-turning traffic into controlled U-turn movements.

GDOT told the Board the intersection does not meet traffic-volume criteria for a traffic signal, and that vehicles making right turns are not counted toward signal warrants. Commissioners questioned practical effects: Commissioner Barry Cox and others warned that semi-trucks and logging trucks would likely turn onto and damage several local roads if left-turn options were limited, and Commissioner Timmy Lucas said the County wants a traffic light.

GDOT staff said the agency will need the Commission’s support to install an RCUT and that the RCUT would not later be replaced with a traffic signal. GDOT staff also discussed budgetary and engineering tradeoffs for alternatives and said an overpass would require a substantially different funding scale. Commissioners asked for more discussion before committing support.

The work session record shows no formal action during the meeting; GDOT indicated it would not proceed without county support and emphasized that the signal-warrant standards are based on traffic volumes rather than crash counts.