Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Real Estate Tax Rebate topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Charlotte County delays public hearing after resident flags real estate tax rebate issue

Charlotte County Board of Supervisors · March 1, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At the Aug. 14 meeting the board announced receipt of an email from resident Kathy Liston asserting the October 2022 real estate tax rebate ordinance did not achieve its intended result; staff will investigate and the public hearing scheduled for that evening was canceled pending a Sept. 11 follow-up.

Chairman Gary D. Walker read a public announcement at the Charlotte County Board of Supervisors’ Aug. 14 regular meeting saying county staff received an email from resident Kathy Liston asserting that the real estate tax rebate ordinance adopted in October 2022 has not produced the board’s intended result.

The board said staff will investigate Ms. Liston’s concerns and report back with recommended action. The announcement said any board action taken at the Sept. 11 meeting will be timely and that the public hearing scheduled for Aug. 14 to receive comment on a draft ordinance that would pay taxpayers a portion of previously paid real estate tax was canceled in light of the new information.

The announcement enumerated the board’s preliminary steps: it acknowledged receipt of the matter, instructed staff to investigate and advise the board, stated that action on Sept. 11 would be timely, cancelled the evening’s public hearing, and said the board would advertise a public hearing for the Sept. 11 meeting on the ordinance as drafted or as revised.

The announcement was read by Chairman Walker; the transcript attributes the message to the board rather than to a single speaker’s new policy decision. No formal vote on the ordinance was taken at the Aug. 14 meeting.